Discussion:
Wow, what did Dr. M says?
(too old to reply)
Ventura
2005-05-25 06:08:39 UTC
Permalink
Israel barred him from the West Bank town of Jenin last week to prevent him
from seeing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Pan
2005-05-25 06:44:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ventura
Israel barred him from the West Bank town of Jenin last week to prevent him
from seeing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Wow, what a putz! I'm glad he's out of office, but he really could do
a lot of good by shutting his trap. He's creating diplomatic static
for Malaysia even while retired.

Michael

If you would like to send a private email to me, please take out the NOTRASH. Please do not email me something which you also posted.
TheRomanov
2005-05-25 07:18:30 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ventura
Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Because the Palestinian suicide bombing is the EFFECT of Israeli
atrocities against Palestinians.
Pan
2005-05-25 08:04:48 UTC
Permalink
On 25 May 2005 00:18:30 -0700, "TheRomanov"
Post by TheRomanov
Post by Ventura
Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Because the Palestinian suicide bombing is the EFFECT of Israeli
atrocities against Palestinians.
In that case, why is it that the latest round of suicide bombings
started at the time when Barak was offering Arafat a capital in
Jerusalem, 90-something% (I've seen figures from 94-97% in different
versions of what the Barak offer was) of the West Bank, all of Gaza,
and part of the Negev over the Green Line to compensate for a very
small part of the "West Bank" he proposed to include in Israel, plus
settlement of at least 50,000 Palestinian refugees in Israel proper
and compensation for all the rest?

You are a liar and a bigot! Your claim is that everything is the Jews'
fault, including bank interest. I remind you that lying is a sin in
Islam, unless you believe that you are engaging in taqqiya (lying as a
form of warfare) and everyone who is not a Muslim is your perpetual
enemy. The problem with that is first of all that people who lie often
enough start believing their lies, to their disadvantage - and also,
that if you believe that, you have no cause to complain if "kafirs"
kill you.

Michael

If you would like to send a private email to me, please take out the NOTRASH. Please do not email me something which you also posted.
TheRomanov
2005-05-25 09:01:38 UTC
Permalink
Huargggh.... It's a long term affair dude. They start first, another
also start, they do it, the other doing it again...and again.... and
again..... and again..... Huarghhhh...
Post by Pan
In that case, why is it that the latest round of suicide bombings
started at the time when Barak was offering Arafat a capital in
Jerusalem, 90-something% (I've seen figures from 94-97% in different
versions of what the Barak offer was) of the West Bank, all of Gaza,
and part of the Negev over the Green Line to compensate for a very
small part of the "West Bank" he proposed to include in Israel, plus
settlement of at least 50,000 Palestinian refugees in Israel proper
and compensation for all the rest?
You are a liar and a bigot! Your claim is that everything is the Jews'
fault, including bank interest. I remind you that lying is a sin in
Islam, unless you believe that you are engaging in taqqiya (lying as a
form of warfare) and everyone who is not a Muslim is your perpetual
enemy. The problem with that is first of all that people who lie often
enough start believing their lies, to their disadvantage - and also,
that if you believe that, you have no cause to complain if "kafirs"
kill you.
yansimon52
2005-05-26 00:30:24 UTC
Permalink
You must be a muslim to make this sort of statement...

Don't forget that, even their (palestinian) closest muslim neighbours
won't even dare to meddle with these illiterate lot (majority
palestinian) cause, they had bad experience when trying to negiotiate
with Isrealis...

Hey, what do you expect when someone tried to negiotiate (for peace) on
your behalf and you see, sucide bombings occured just next door?? How
to negiotiate??

So, most of their neighbours couldn't be bother to help their own
muslim brotherhood..
Pan
2005-05-26 05:19:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by yansimon52
You must be a muslim to make this sort of statement...
Don't forget that, even their (palestinian) closest muslim neighbours
won't even dare to meddle with these illiterate lot (majority
palestinian) cause, they had bad experience when trying to negiotiate
with Isrealis...
You mean with the Palestinians or Israelis?

But you're totally incorrect to call Palestinians illiterate. The
Palestinians are generally considered to be the most highly educated
nationality in the Middle East other than the Israelis.
Post by yansimon52
Hey, what do you expect when someone tried to negiotiate (for peace) on
your behalf and you see, sucide bombings occured just next door?? How
to negiotiate??
So, most of their neighbours couldn't be bother to help their own
muslim brotherhood..
King Hussein, who had tried his damndest to incorporate the "West
Bank" into Jordan prior to 1967, was delighted to announce the end of
Jordan's claim on the territory after he came to the realization that
a reoccupation of that territory would destroy the Hashemite kingdom.
Meanwhile, Jordan's government has effectively cooperated with
Israel's on security along their border for decades and the two
governments now have friendly relations.

Michael

If you would like to send a private email to me, please take out the NOTRASH. Please do not email me something which you also posted.
Pan
2005-05-26 05:15:02 UTC
Permalink
On 25 May 2005 02:01:38 -0700, "TheRomanov"
Post by TheRomanov
Post by Pan
In that case, why is it that the latest round of suicide bombings
started at the time when Barak was offering Arafat a capital in
Jerusalem, 90-something% (I've seen figures from 94-97% in different
versions of what the Barak offer was) of the West Bank, all of Gaza,
and part of the Negev over the Green Line to compensate for a very
small part of the "West Bank" he proposed to include in Israel, plus
settlement of at least 50,000 Palestinian refugees in Israel proper
and compensation for all the rest?
You are a liar and a bigot! Your claim is that everything is the Jews'
fault, including bank interest. I remind you that lying is a sin in
Islam, unless you believe that you are engaging in taqqiya (lying as a
form of warfare) and everyone who is not a Muslim is your perpetual
enemy. The problem with that is first of all that people who lie often
enough start believing their lies, to their disadvantage - and also,
that if you believe that, you have no cause to complain if "kafirs"
kill you.
Huargggh.... It's a long term affair dude. They start first, another
also start, they do it, the other doing it again...and again.... and
again..... and again..... Huarghhhh...
OK, now you're being honest and truthful. But why do I have to
confront you before you post honestly?

Michael

If you would like to send a private email to me, please take out the NOTRASH. Please do not email me something which you also posted.
Ventura
2005-05-25 12:41:08 UTC
Permalink
Long long ago, two great-great-great-grandfathers had a fight and started
punching each other. A few generation down, their descendants followed up
and are still punching each other accusing each of starting the incident
first. Will this ever end?
Post by TheRomanov
Post by Ventura
Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Because the Palestinian suicide bombing is the EFFECT of Israeli
atrocities against Palestinians.
Di Da Di
2005-05-26 20:57:57 UTC
Permalink
thsi is like a kind of generation sin.
Post by Ventura
Long long ago, two great-great-great-grandfathers had a fight and started
punching each other. A few generation down, their descendants followed up
and are still punching each other accusing each of starting the incident
first. Will this ever end?
Post by TheRomanov
Post by Ventura
Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Because the Palestinian suicide bombing is the EFFECT of Israeli
atrocities against Palestinians.
Ed
2005-05-26 01:14:43 UTC
Permalink
Post by TheRomanov
Post by Ventura
Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Because the Palestinian suicide bombing is the EFFECT of Israeli
atrocities against Palestinians.
Ummm no it isn't, and it's obvious you have no idea about the history of the
region. You can begin your education here:

http://www.palestinefacts.org/
Nirvana
2005-05-25 09:17:35 UTC
Permalink
what is the success rate?
Post by Ventura
Israel barred him from the West Bank town of Jenin last week to prevent him
from seeing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
globalise
2005-05-25 10:11:06 UTC
Permalink
Certainly expose the level of statemanship of this dude.
Post by Ventura
Israel barred him from the West Bank town of Jenin last week to prevent him
from seeing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
Ceciro
2005-05-26 11:46:07 UTC
Permalink
Mahathir was banned because he was the palestinian suicide bomber.
Post by Ventura
Israel barred him from the West Bank town of Jenin last week to prevent him
from seeing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
George Ramayah
2005-05-26 15:11:35 UTC
Permalink
Post by Ceciro
Mahathir was banned because he was the palestinian suicide bomber.
you meant Osama promised him 72 virgins too?
Post by Ceciro
Post by Ventura
Israel barred him from the West Bank town of Jenin last week to prevent him
from seeing Israeli atrocities against Palestinians. I wonder why didn't he
equally so mention about those Palestinian suicide bombings?
lobert lo
2005-05-27 03:36:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by George Ramayah
Post by Ceciro
Mahathir was banned because he was the palestinian suicide bomber.
you meant Osama promised him 72 virgins too?
Nope! Mahatir promised Osama and the bombers 72 virgin.
Ceciro
2005-05-27 10:20:46 UTC
Permalink
Osama Never said a word. Just bent down.

Alkhwarizmi Alhonee
2005-05-27 02:52:57 UTC
Permalink
Columbia University academics targeted for opposing official myths of Zionism


With the US Congress and the White House almost completely controlled by them, the zionist brigade has launched a strong assault on what is left of academic freedom in the US: the purpose is to force intellectuals to teach zionist myths at American universities. The immediate target is Columbia University in New York, but other institutions are also coming under pressure. A number of professors at Columbia have been targeted for presenting an alternative perspective to the zionist-approved version of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The pattern is very familiar: anyone who dares criticize Israel's policies is immediately accused of "anti-Semitism".

Leading the witch-hunt is Daniel Pipes, who gained notoriety three years ago when he set up a group called Campus Watch. Campus Watch lists academics on a roster for their alleged bias against Israel. Professors at American universities were so outraged by this brazen attempted intimidation that more than 400 sent their names to be put on the list. The zionists, however, do not give up easily. Pipes' fellows in this enterprise include such supporters of Israel as Martin Kramer, Charles Jacobs, David Horowitz and Alan Dershowitz; the last is a law professor at Harvard who has advocated the torture of detainees at Guantanamo Bay for information. These men have recruited undergraduate zealots to monitor university professors who express opinions at variance with zionist propaganda, so that they can exert pressure on university administrators to fire them.

Pipes is a Muslim-bating zionist. He says that every Muslim in North America is a potential terrorist; that Muslims eat strange-smelling foods and do not maintain "Germanic standards of hygiene". Coming from a people who do not even wash their hands after going to the washroom, this takes gall. Were a Muslim to utter such cant against Jews or Judaism (or indeed against anyone: Catholics, for instance), he would be prosecuted for hate crimes; anti-Muslim prejudice and intolerance, however, have become acceptable in North America, and are becoming acceptable in Europe as well.

There are also other reasons for Columbia University's being singled out: in 2002 students and professors at Columbia launched a campaign urging the university to withdraw funds invested in companies that manufacture and sell weapons to Israel. This came about after Israel's army rampaged through Jenin refugee-camp (in the West Bank) in April 2002. There was an immediate counter-attack from Rabbi Charles Sheer, director of the Columbia/Barnard chapter of Hillel, the Jewish campus organization. He collected 33,000 signatures to stop this "divestment" campaign, not only at Columbia but also at other American universities. Encouraged by this success, Sheer then launched an attack against Columbia's Middle East and Asian Languages and Cultures (MEALAC) department, accusing professors of "intimidating" Jewish students and suggesting that their acceptance of Arab money-mainly from Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States-tainted their academic integrity. That the allegation was politically motivated was proved by the fact that another professor, Fouad Ajami of John Hopkins, who has also received Saudi money and has close connections with the Saudi ambassador in Washington, has not been targeted: he is staunchly pro-Israel. The message is clear: dare to criticize Israel, and the zionists will attack.

A shadowy Boston-based outfit, the David Project, has joined Rabbi Sheer in this campaign of vilification. The David Project is linked to another group calling itself the Israel on Campus Coalition (ICC), an organization whose members include the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) and the American Jewish Committee. Other Jewish groups that support the campaign against Columbia's professors include the American Jewish Congress, the Washington Institute for Near East Policy, the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, the Zionist Organization of America, and so on. Funding for the ICC has come from the Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Foundation, which recently provided a US$1,050,000 grant to wage the campus battle. Professional advice has come from the consulting firm of McKinsey & Company, another pro-Israeli outfit. The ICC's mandate is to "take back the campus", because American zionists claim to have noticed an "alarming" rise in pro-Palestinian sentiment in the academic community.

The David Project has purportedly produced a film-it is actually a series of films, though never shown in public, that keep changing scripts depending on the audience-called Columbia Unbecoming, which shows "testimony" of Jewish students, some with faces masked and voices muffled, alleging intimidation by pro-Palestinian professors. Not all Jewish students or professors support these allegations; in fact, some have questioned both the motives and the tactics used in this campaign of lies and distortions.

Robert Pollack, a professor of biological sciences and a former dean of the University's Columbia College, is one of them. "It is a crazy, crazy exaggeration to claim that Jews are under attack at Columbia or that the faculty is anti-Semitic." When asked about Columbia Unbecoming, Pollack said: "No one has seen the video; there is no video to see. There's a cloud of videos constantly changing. It's innuendo and gossip." Pollack is neither an admirer of MEALAC nor a sympathizer of the Palestinian cause; in fact he is a well-known supporter of Israel who often clashed with the late Edward Said over the Israel-Palestinian conflict, but he regards the current campaign as damaging to the zionist cause. The Kraft Center, where much of the so-called video was filmed, was built largely by means of funds raised by Pollack, who refers to it as a "gift of the Jewish community" to Columbia.

Despite Pollack's open criticism of the video or videos and of the ICC's tactics, Columbia University president Lee Bollinger bowed to external pressure and set up a committee to investigate the zionists' allegations. He has failed to speak out against the zionists' intimidating tactics, including phone threats against faculty staff, thus forcing 20 of Columbia's professors to organise a teach-in on April 4 to challenge and refute the allegations. More than 400 students heard the professors criticize in strong terms the committee's report, which had been released a week earlier, partly because it presented testimony only from students, without taking the trouble to speak to any of the professors. Even so, the report decided that the professors had no bias. The professors under attack are Joseph Massad, Hamid Dabashi, George Saliba and Rashid Khalidi. A number of newspapers, among them the Daily Sun, the Daily News, the New York Post, the Village Voice and the Wall Street Journal, have also joined the fray, presenting only the zionist version of what is going on at Columbia University.

The media war has received a boost from that other citadel of zionist support, the US congress, called "zionist-occupied territory" by Pat Buchanan, a television-commentator. In 2003 the House of Representatives passed HR3077, a bill that mandated that area-studies programmes that receive federal government funding must "foster debate on American foreign policy from diverse perspectives." This is a direct assault on academic freedom, telling professors how and what they must teach. The expression "diverse perspectives" is revealing; in fact it is misleading, pretending as it does that the bill advocates some kind of balance (and thus fairness), when in fact what the bill proposes is that there must always be two points of view presented when any subject is taught. Thus criticism of Israeli policies or questioning its right to usurp Palestinian lands must be "balanced" by presenting the zionist version of the Jews as a "persecuted people", of Palestine as "a land without people for a people without a land" and so on. Yet these same zionists would never agree (for instance) to the Nazis' version of the second world war being presented when discussing the persecution of Jews in Germany.

This House bill was initiated by Martin Kramer, Pipes' fellow promoter of zionist mythology as history. Kramer is a senior associate of the Moshe Dyan Center for Middle Eastern and African Studies at Tel Aviv University. When Bollinger gave in to the zionists' pressure and set up the committee, Kramer was ecstatic. In late January Kramer stated that Bollinger "should have to jump through a hundred more hoops" before the MEALAC matter can be settled. Kramer clearly sees Columbia's president as a pet dog that must do its master's bidding. Pipes also expressed deep satisfaction over developments at Columbia in a recent interview with Harvard Magazine.

But why has Bollinger been so accommodating of the zionists' demands? He is believed to be under pressure from Columbia's pro-Israel alumni, whom he cannot upset because it might complicate his fundraising drive for the university's planned expansion into West Harlem. Bollinger has staked his reputation on this 30-year, $5-billion project and does not want it to be undermined by something as minor as "academic freedom", especially when the people most affected are merely a few professors who are sympathetic to Palestine and the Palestinians. Not surprisingly, he is reluctant to discuss the political imperatives surrounding the controversy.

The ICC has a single "affiliate member": the David Project, led by Charles Jacobs, a co-founder of CAMERA, the pro-Israel media-watchdog group. Jacobs is also the founder of the American Anti-Slavery Group, which calls itself "America's leading human rights group dedicated to abolishing modern day slavery worldwide". This organization, in league with evangelical Christians, targets only Muslim countries-Sudan and Mauritania, for instance-that are accused of trading in slavery; these partners have in the past perpetrated highly publicized stunts to provide 'proof' of their allegations that slavery is prevalent in these countries. Such evidence has since been exposed as completely fraudulent. Jacobs also has other fellow zionists-Richard Perle, Charles Krauthammer and Bill Kristol, among others-who are not only members of the board of advisers of such exotic entities as the Foundation for the Defense of Democracies, but have also launched the Project for the New American Century (PNAC). The PNAC openly advocates endless wars and pre-emptive strikes against other countries. All these men are unabashed apologists for Israel and its racist policies, putting their loyalty to Israel before their loyalty to the US, if any.

At the University of Columbia the battle-lines are clearly drawn, but the targeted professors have not been cowed into silence. Their defiance has won support from a number of professors at other American institutions who find the ICC's tactics distasteful. The end-result of this battle will determine whether the zionist mythology project will be rolled back or whether (like the US's two main political institutions, the US Congress and the White House) American universities will become zionist-occupied territories too. Because of the manner in which the American press and broadcast media have caved in to pressure to toe the zionist line, those who stand in the zionists' way are likely to find their struggle tough going. Standing up for truth, however, is never easy; academic institutions in the US are not going to become an exception to this general rule of human affairs. These are interesting times to be in America, to be an American, and to be an American advocate of truth or justice.
Alkhwarizmi Alhonee
2005-05-27 02:59:23 UTC
Permalink
A true diagnosis of the state of the Muslim Ummah can only be based on the Qur'an because all other formulations are either half-truths or simply figments of imagination, bearing no relation to reality.



It is now well recognized that the 1.5 billion people who call themselves Muslims are in a state of multiple crises encompassing all aspects of life. The explanations offered for this devastating state of their political, economic, cultural, and social lives vary depending upon the perspectives used for such analyses, but all answers eventually fall into two broad categories: in the first category are explanations that hold Islam responsible for this state of affairs; in the second are those that consider the abandonment of Islam by Muslims as the main cause of their decline. The former views Islam as a static dogma that is antithetical to progress; the latter considers Islam to be a dynamic system of life, meant for all times and places. The former perspective originated in the West some 300 years ago and has seeped into the Muslim world, where it has now assumed a modified form in which, instead of blaming Islam directly, a circuitous route is used to find fault with it by saying that it is not Islam but a static interpretation of it that is the root cause of the decline of Muslims. The remedy suggested by these people calls for a new and "enlightened" interpretation of Islam-an interpretation that is consonant with modernity, which is, in turn, equated with progress.

Both explanations offered for their plight, however, accept that Muslims are in a deep crisis. While this is true in a particular sense, this verdict needs to be qualified: the standard used here for ascertaining the Muslims' present state is not an absolute but a relative measure which actually compares their situation with that of the West. This comparison of the social, political and economic state of the Muslim world with that of the West, or one of the other civilizations that has already surrendered to it, is based on certain standards. Just as a weighing scale is designed to measure weight, similarly other standards are used to measure the decline and progress of civilizations. This inevitably involves definition of primary terms, such as progress, prosperity, and the quality of life. Such a comparison also takes certain basic values, modes of living, and social and economic structures as its baseline. These hidden factors are of extreme importance in this comparison. A yardstick minted in the West will obviously value only what the West holds dear; it will give no merit to things considered important by Muslims but which hold no value for the West.

Let us take the example of the "home", which holds a primary position in Islam. A home, blessed by the remembrance of Allah, may He be Exalted, is where the first nurturing of a child takes place. The Prophet of Islam, may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him, said that homes where the recitation of the Qur'an takes place are like shining stars for the beings that reside in the skies. This means that the angels look down upon such homes as we look at the stars. A yardstick based on Islamic standards will, therefore, give primary importance to the home. This is certainly not the case if the Western yardstick is applied. Thus we arrive at different conclusions about the state of a society depending on which yardstick is used.

Furthermore, there is the question of "norms". What is held normative in one society may not be considered a norm in another. Over the last century, many aspects have been "normalized" by the Western civilization because they had become a fait accompli in the West. This process of "normalization" of deviations makes virtues out of vices. For instance, divorce, which was once looked upon as an undesirable outcome of a marriage, has been "normalized" to such an extent that now it is accepted as normal. In fact, every third marriage in the US culminates in divorce in less than seven years, but this is not viewed as a matter of much concern because marriage itself has lost all value in the West, with the result that its age-old definition has been altered to legally sanction promiscuity. This is just one example. Numerous other primary definitions have been altered in the West in like manner, resulting in the emergence of a society in which moral and ethical values are no longer considered important. Home has lost the central function it used to have; as a result, most homes have become dreadful places where, instead of love and nurturing, there is violence, abuse, and intolerable suffering. The fact that out of a total of 60 million American children, five million are today considered as "children at-risk" provides an indication of the extent of the calamity that has befallen the West.

When judged from the West's point of view, a society is considered to be in a state of decline merely because it does not meet certain quantitative standards that give no importance to non-measurable aspects such as love and caring at home, interpersonal relationships, values, and piety. Furthermore, these yardsticks are flawed even for measuring the purely quantitative aspects of society because they measure economic growth, production and distribution and other factors with numerous tacit assumptions that are not valid in non-Western societies. The extended family system, for instance, alters economic measurements in a significant manner. A person who earns $1,000 a month in the US and who has no family support network is economically not in the same situation as a person who earns an equivalent amount in Iran but who has a solid and supportive network of family, where income and resources are pooled.

When these flawed measurements are used, Muslim societies appear at the bottom of the list and Islam is blamed for their sorry state. But those who blame Islam fail to explain how it is a hindrance to material progress, especially when Islam produced a civilization that flourished materially for hundreds of years. This is akin to the judgement of many Orientalists about the enterprise of science in Islam. They say that the Scientific Revolution could not have taken place in the Islamic civilization because there is something inherent in Islam that hinders such developments. Those who hold such a view fail to explain why Islam was instrumental in the emergence of a scientific tradition that flourished for 800 years.

This correction is, however, not being presented to deny the sorry state of the Muslim Ummah but only to gain a true perspective, because without such a perspective one is likely to pass a sweeping verdict of decay against Muslim societies that amounts to demeaning certain primary values. This corrected perspective may also help us to determine where to focus the Herculean task of reconstruction of Muslim societies, because before any reconstruction can take place we must understand the true nature of the malaise and assess the extent of the damage. This, however, cannot be done by using Western yardsticks; such a diagnosis has to be rooted in the Qur'an, which tells us that Allah, may He be Exalted, has a Sunnah, a way, that is constant: "And never will you find any change in Allah's custom" (al-Ahzab, 62). The rise and fall of nations has always followed a set of rules that have been explained in the Qur'an in many ways, and there is no reason to believe that these rules are going to be changed in the twenty-first century merely because one part of humanity has developed spaceships and cruise missiles.

A true diagnosis of the state of the Muslim Ummah can only be based on the Qur'an because all other formulations are either half-truths or simply figments of imagination, bearing no relation to reality. One of the most important aspects of the Qur'anic mode of understanding the state of a society is to examine the state of individual men and women who make up the society. This emphasis on the individual is also the Qur'anic way of building righteous societies. Thus, in order to produce any change in Muslim societies, a change has to occur in the moral, spiritual and material state of the individuals who make up these societies. Therefore, when it is said that the Muslim world is in a state of decay, it actually means that men and women who call themselves Muslims are in a state of decay, and this cannot be but the direct result of their abandoning the two sources of Islam which provide Muslims with their code of living-a code that empowers them as vicegerents of Allah on earth. A true Muslim cannot be in a state of decay, because it is a historically verifiable fact that when they truly followed Islam, Muslims were able to establish flourishing, creative societies. Therefore, it must be the abandonment of Islam that is the cause of their present sorry state.

In addition to abandoning Islam as a way of life, a replacement has also been found: the Western way of life. This displacement that has produced a deep malaise in the Muslim world has resulted in inverted values and changed yardsticks, and has clouded the clear vision provided by Islam to such an extent that the artificial glitter of the West has completely mesmerized an odd assortment of despotic rulers, generals and self-proclaimed kings. They want to emulate the West in everything: lifestyle, ideals and modes of existence and force this way of life on their societies as well. When the masses follow these false models, the disease then spreads to the whole fabric of society.

The most pressing challenge for Muslim intellectuals today is to find ways to stem the tide of rapid westernization of their societies. They need to expose the inadequacy of the Western model and show why and how a life based on Islamic principles is the only solution to the numerous problems afflicting Muslim societies. Having understood that it is the individual members who need to be the focal point of a process of reconstruction, we must now identify the influences that form and shape individual lives in society. In other words, we need to understand what makes an individual a committed and active Muslim.

The most important influences in the life of a child come from the home and school. The early years of education not only produce skills, they also form their worldview and lasting habits. This is why the Qur'an used to be the first and foremost Book studied by every child in the Muslim world. This first impression of the Qur'an used to mould lives. Children also used to learn certain basic pedagogical skills through the Qur'an. In the contemporary age, an increasing number of Muslims do not understand the Qur'an. They fail to recognize that the recitation of the Qur'an is not a passive 'ibadah but an initiative on the part of a believer that is capable of transforming the entire life of the one who is reciting the ayaat of the Book of Allah, may He be Exalted. It is an active process that simultaneously produces an inner shift in the way we look at the entire spectrum of our earthly existence. This interaction with the Book also used to be a life-long process of transformative learning. And it was this Book that used to produce dynamic leadership in Muslim societies-a leadership at once capable of understanding the complexities of this world and discovering the straight path to the next.

This is no longer the case. Today, the worldview of many contemporary Muslims is not formed by the Qur'an but by secular education, with a smattering of Islam taught in piecemeal fashion. This is the root of all the calamities that have befallen the Muslims. The colonizing powers understood that in order to undermine the Muslim world they had to cut off the roots of the Muslim educational system. They impounded endowments (awqaaf), confiscated properties and destroyed orchards and farms that used to supply material resources for health and educational institutions, and implanted instead their own educational institutions. In time, these implanted caricatures of Western education replaced the entire system of education in the Muslim world, producing Muslims who have been uprooted from their spiritual and intellectual soil. As a result, most Muslims today have a very poor understanding of their deen and its scholarly tradition.

Today, the teaching of Islam and its formidable intellectual tradition have been relegated to a secondary position for the vast majority of Muslims. Secular education can only produce secular Muslims-individuals who keep Islam in one closet and the world in another; for them, the former is merely concerned with the Hereafter. This malaise has spread to such an extent that it is rare to find "educated Muslims" who know anything about the works of scholars like Fakhr al-Din al-Razi, Abu Hamid al-Ghazali, Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziah, and hundreds of other intellectual giants. Further, most so-called educated Muslims consider this vast body of scholarship irrelevant, outdated medieval texts fit for the dustbin. The real tragedy is that they have rendered this judgement without ever opening a single page of this vast corpus of literature that deals with some of the most important issues facing them in their daily lives.

This is the case of the "educated" Muslims; most of those who do not attend secular educational institutions suffer from another disease. They attend madaris where the religious content of curricula is limited to a few texts and where no attention is paid to the large body of scholarship that deals with the contemporary world; even medicine, mathematics and natural sciences are not taught in these institutions of "religious learning". Thus they are unable to produce men and women who can assume leadership roles in society, abandoning the task of state and governance in the hands of secularized Muslims educated and trained in institutions built on the model provided by the West. This has produced a deep chasm in Muslim societies: the vast majority receive secular education while a small minority acquire religious education, and the two remain at odds with each other, creating tension and conflict in society because of their divergent worldviews. There are, of course, exceptions to this: individuals who have acquired knowledge of both worlds through their own initiative, but such exceptions are rare.

In order to lay the foundations of a sustainable Islamic movement, sweeping changes are needed at all levels in Muslim societies, especially in the educational sector. While most Muslims realize this need, there are hardly any institutions devoted to the development of new educational resources, which are built on the Qur'anic worldview, that are capable of nurturing the skills and the training required to understand the contemporary world. In the absence of such curricula, Muslim children continue to serve secularized institutions and Muslim societies continue to move away from the Qur'anic worldview; this automatically produces submission to the West because that is what the educational system covertly infuses in young minds.

This is obviously a long-term process; there are no short-cuts to cure the deep malaise of the Ummah. When viewed in the Qur'anic framework of the rise and fall of civilizations, a well-organized initiative to develop new educational resources, and institutions to teach this new curriculum, may well be the shortest way to begin the transformative process that will generate a new kind of Muslim leadership in the next generation-a leadership rooted in the vision of Islam and able to confront, comprehend and tackle the challenges of the twenty-first century.
Observer
2005-05-27 09:50:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by Alkhwarizmi Alhonee
A true diagnosis of the state of the Muslim Ummah can only be based on the
Qur'an >because all other formulations are either half-truths or simply
figments of imagination, >bearing no relation to reality.
Post by Alkhwarizmi Alhonee
It is now well recognized that the 1.5 billion people who call themselves
Muslims are in >a state of multiple crises encompassing all aspects of life.
The explanations offered >for this devastating state of their political,
economic, cultural, and social lives vary >depending upon the perspectives
used for such analyses, but all answers eventually >fall into two broad
categories: in the first category are explanations that hold Islam
Post by Alkhwarizmi Alhonee
responsible for this state of affairs; in the second are those that
consider the >abandonment of Islam by Muslims as the main cause of their
decline.


BULLSHIT.
Another attempt to hide the fact that its
the so called ULAMAK BONGOK and their
interpretation of Islam thats the problem.

Nothing to do with Islam or Muslims abandoning
Islam.
This is a piece written by supporters of those
ULAMAK BONGOK to hide the fact that its
THEM and their century of stranglehold on the
direction of Muslims thats causing the great
decline.
Who is it that prevents Muslims from THINKING
and being CRITICAL and ask Muslims to be
parrots and blind followers?

BASTARDS.
Loading...