Discussion:
Paternity Fraud Issues
(too old to reply)
Done
2006-02-10 02:02:25 UTC
Permalink
Repost from soc.men to Australian groups as paternity fraud is common
downunder.
Another fraud is extension of paternity fraud - so called "child support".

"MCP" <***@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:VHEGf.274043$***@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
http://www.mens-rights.net/law/paternityfraud.htm

Introduction

In the USA today, DNA paternity testing has proven that at least 30% of
men who are paying child support are NOT the biological father of the
child that the Government forces them to support. At present around
300,000 DNA paternity tests are performed on an annual basis, which
means that 90,000 males are being forced to pay child support for a
child they are NOT the biological father of.

The Cause And Effect

The Court System is notorious for forcing males to continue paying child
support for children that they are NOT the biological father of as DNA
testing proves. It is also brought to the knowledge of the judges in the
individual cases that DNA testing proves the male paying child support
is NOT the biological father. This equates to 90,000 American males
being forced to financially support children that DNA paternity testing
proves they are NOT biologically related to. As child support is
mandatory for the first 18 years of a child's life, this means that
these males are forced to pay child support for up to 18 years.
Therefore based on this, a minimum of 1,600,000 (1.6 million) males are
being forced to financially support children that they are NOT
biologically related to.

On average 4,000,000 (4 million) children are born per year in USA,
therefore up to 1,200,000 American males are being victimised by
paternity fraud on an annual basis. This figure is produced via the fact
that DNA paternity testing proves that 30% of the males involved are not
biologically related to the children they were accused of being the
father of.

As many as 21,000,000 (21 million) American men at present are forced to
financially support a child they are not the biological father of. This
is all due to the lies of the mother and the injustice of the court
system. This calculation of such a figure was produced via the fact that
child support is paid over a minimum of 18 years, therefore males who
were victimised by paternity fraud just under 18 years ago will still be
paying child support. As 1,600,000 (1.6 million) American males become
victims of paternity fraud on an annual basis, over a span of 18 years
this equals 21,000,000 males who are being victimised to this very day.

The Law

While paternity fraud fits the criteria to be considered a form of
fraud, loopholes in the law system prevent offenders of paternity fraud
from being prosecuted via the law system. The method used in which a
male is forced by the Government to pay child support is very anti-male,
unfair and oppressive. It begins at the hospital, straight after birth
when the mother has to declare the name of a male and claim he is the
father of the child. She's allowed to put any name she likes without the
consent of the male and without his presence.

The male accused has only 30 days to dispute the claim, and if he
doesn't dispute the claim he is then forced to pay child support for at
least 18 years and refusing to do so can have him placed in jail.
Apparently it doesn't matter if he is overseas or serving in the
military during those 30 days and isn't even made aware of the claim
until the 30 day period has expired, he will be forced to pay child
support.

Feminism

Feminists have publicly stated how the law system MUST allow paternity
fraud to continue. Such absurd and illogical basis that the feminists
have used to base their demand on, is that the child's best interest
takes precedent over the fact that the mother committed a horrific crime
which has ruined the life of an innocent male, which has enslaved him
for at least 18 years. Their reasoning is that a child would be better
of not knowing who their biological father is. Now it's blatantly
obvious that there is no way that the child would benefit from what the
feminists claimed must happen. A child would benefit most from knowing
who their biological father is.

Also it is quite evident that the mother would benefit from the
situation that the feminists support, as the mother would

1.. Avoid being prosecuted
2.. She would obtain a large sum of money from the man she victimised
and continue to obtain that money on a monthly basis over a span of at
least 18 years.
Based on that, it's quite evident that the feminists only want a system
which allows females to commit paternity fraud, be given impunity from
the law system, be allowed to continue to commit paternity fraud which
then enslaves her victim so that he is legally forced to financially
support her.

The feminists have also stated that women who intentionally commit
paternity fraud should not be punished for their fraudulent actions,
because they claim their children need them. However the feminists do
not mention the fact that the children also "need" a biological father
as part of their life.

Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
To visit the section of Glenn Sack's site that contains the MP3 file,
Click Here. There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.

(All information was supplied by Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A., and
the original article which he wrote can be found at Men For Justice.)

Paternity Fraud Links:

Paternity Fraud.Com

Paternity Fraud Statistics
--
Men are everywhere that matters!

A dog is wiser than a woman; it does not bark at its master.
Russian Proverb
Beavis & Butthead
2006-02-10 02:43:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Done
Repost from soc.men to Australian groups as paternity fraud is common
downunder.
Aussie girls are sluts.
Post by Done
Another fraud is extension of paternity fraud - so called "child support".
http://www.mens-rights.net/law/paternityfraud.htm
Introduction
In the USA today, DNA paternity testing has proven that at least 30% of
men who are paying child support are NOT the biological father of the
child that the Government forces them to support. At present around
300,000 DNA paternity tests are performed on an annual basis, which
means that 90,000 males are being forced to pay child support for a
child they are NOT the biological father of.
The Cause And Effect
The Court System is notorious for forcing males to continue paying child
support for children that they are NOT the biological father of as DNA
testing proves. It is also brought to the knowledge of the judges in the
individual cases that DNA testing proves the male paying child support
is NOT the biological father. This equates to 90,000 American males
being forced to financially support children that DNA paternity testing
proves they are NOT biologically related to. As child support is
mandatory for the first 18 years of a child's life, this means that
these males are forced to pay child support for up to 18 years.
Therefore based on this, a minimum of 1,600,000 (1.6 million) males are
being forced to financially support children that they are NOT
biologically related to.
On average 4,000,000 (4 million) children are born per year in USA,
therefore up to 1,200,000 American males are being victimised by
paternity fraud on an annual basis. This figure is produced via the fact
that DNA paternity testing proves that 30% of the males involved are not
biologically related to the children they were accused of being the
father of.
As many as 21,000,000 (21 million) American men at present are forced to
financially support a child they are not the biological father of. This
is all due to the lies of the mother and the injustice of the court
system. This calculation of such a figure was produced via the fact that
child support is paid over a minimum of 18 years, therefore males who
were victimised by paternity fraud just under 18 years ago will still be
paying child support. As 1,600,000 (1.6 million) American males become
victims of paternity fraud on an annual basis, over a span of 18 years
this equals 21,000,000 males who are being victimised to this very day.
The Law
While paternity fraud fits the criteria to be considered a form of
fraud, loopholes in the law system prevent offenders of paternity fraud
from being prosecuted via the law system. The method used in which a
male is forced by the Government to pay child support is very anti-male,
unfair and oppressive. It begins at the hospital, straight after birth
when the mother has to declare the name of a male and claim he is the
father of the child. She's allowed to put any name she likes without the
consent of the male and without his presence.
The male accused has only 30 days to dispute the claim, and if he
doesn't dispute the claim he is then forced to pay child support for at
least 18 years and refusing to do so can have him placed in jail.
Apparently it doesn't matter if he is overseas or serving in the
military during those 30 days and isn't even made aware of the claim
until the 30 day period has expired, he will be forced to pay child
support.
Feminism
Feminists have publicly stated how the law system MUST allow paternity
fraud to continue. Such absurd and illogical basis that the feminists
have used to base their demand on, is that the child's best interest
takes precedent over the fact that the mother committed a horrific crime
which has ruined the life of an innocent male, which has enslaved him
for at least 18 years. Their reasoning is that a child would be better
of not knowing who their biological father is. Now it's blatantly
obvious that there is no way that the child would benefit from what the
feminists claimed must happen. A child would benefit most from knowing
who their biological father is.
Also it is quite evident that the mother would benefit from the
situation that the feminists support, as the mother would
1.. Avoid being prosecuted
2.. She would obtain a large sum of money from the man she victimised
and continue to obtain that money on a monthly basis over a span of at
least 18 years.
Based on that, it's quite evident that the feminists only want a system
which allows females to commit paternity fraud, be given impunity from
the law system, be allowed to continue to commit paternity fraud which
then enslaves her victim so that he is legally forced to financially
support her.
The feminists have also stated that women who intentionally commit
paternity fraud should not be punished for their fraudulent actions,
because they claim their children need them. However the feminists do
not mention the fact that the children also "need" a biological father
as part of their life.
Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
To visit the section of Glenn Sack's site that contains the MP3 file,
Click Here. There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.
(All information was supplied by Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A., and
the original article which he wrote can be found at Men For Justice.)
Paternity Fraud.Com
Paternity Fraud Statistics
--
Men are everywhere that matters!
A dog is wiser than a woman; it does not bark at its master.
Russian Proverb
Dean T
2006-02-10 03:17:01 UTC
Permalink
Post by Beavis & Butthead
Post by Done
Repost from soc.men to Australian groups as paternity fraud is common
downunder.
Aussie girls are sluts.
Where are you from?
Hunter01
2006-02-10 11:35:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dean T
Post by Beavis & Butthead
Post by Done
Repost from soc.men to Australian groups as paternity fraud is common
downunder.
Aussie girls are sluts.
Where are you from?
He calls any woman that has more taste than to go near him a slut. To
him most of the women on this planet are sluts, he loves geriatric bag
ladies though!
EnjoyDialup
2006-02-10 03:36:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Beavis & Butthead
Post by Done
Repost from soc.men to Australian groups as paternity fraud is common
downunder.
Aussie girls are sluts.
Sluts are more fun in bed. Don't knock it until you have tried it! ;)

(just remember to take that used condom with you when you leave!)
--
***@hyperoz.com - You know you want to...

http://www.HyperOz.com

"Every time he tries to get me he gets himself" - Nigel Howe
Rev. C. Frank Lee KSC
2006-02-10 02:44:26 UTC
Permalink
It's the American way of compensating for "the evils white man has
done". We should pay for the horrible things our long dead ancestors
did. Women were treated very badly by the white man and well by most
men in most cultures. So in the minds of the feminist we own them
anyway. This also applies to issues of how certain religious groups and
races have been treated in the past.

I'm not saying it is right, I'm just saying that's the way it is
in this country. The Framers of the Constitution must be rolling in
their graves. Of course they were a bunch of hypocrites anyway. I mean
here are men fighting for their freedom, meanwhile owning slaves. What
a fucked up world we live in aye.




Sincerely,
Rev. C. Frank Lee KSC
AKA RevNeo
AKA Dire Wolf
www.liveround.net
LDL
2006-02-10 02:51:21 UTC
Permalink
"Done" <***@tahool.com.au> wrote in message news:43ebf430$***@news.comindico.com.au...

Rest Snipped.
Post by Done
Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
To visit the section of Glenn Sack's site that contains the MP3 file,
Click Here. There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.
Why cut and paste when you can provide the URL.

It is quite evident with the "Click Here" that is written in the paragraph.
joker
2006-02-10 09:12:25 UTC
Permalink
"LDL" <***@asio.gov.au> wrote in message news:JcTGf.4231$***@news-server.bigpond.net.au...
"Done" <***@tahool.com.au> wrote in message news:43ebf430$***@news.comindico.com.au...

Rest Snipped.
Post by Done
Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
To visit the section of Glenn Sack's site that contains the MP3 file,
Click Here.
Click on what? I see....here are some URL's sopporting feminism and
generally morality of women:

www.lumberjack-links.com

www.freeones.com

www.hanksgalleries.com/main.html

www.elephantlist.com

www.tiava.com

www.pinkworld.com

www.hoes.com

www.dangerdave.com.au


There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
Post by Done
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.
Why cut and paste when you can provide the URL.

It is quite evident with the "Click Here" that is written in the paragraph.

Some people don't like to waste time on suspicious links clicking and it is
a good service to readers to provide the full article instead of only link:

"MCP" <***@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote in message news:VHEGf.274043$***@fe2.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
http://www.mens-rights.net/law/paternityfraud.htm

Introduction

In the USA today, DNA paternity testing has proven that at least 30% of
men who are paying child support are NOT the biological father of the
child that the Government forces them to support. At present around
300,000 DNA paternity tests are performed on an annual basis, which
means that 90,000 males are being forced to pay child support for a
child they are NOT the biological father of.

The Cause And Effect

The Court System is notorious for forcing males to continue paying child
support for children that they are NOT the biological father of as DNA
testing proves. It is also brought to the knowledge of the judges in the
individual cases that DNA testing proves the male paying child support
is NOT the biological father. This equates to 90,000 American males
being forced to financially support children that DNA paternity testing
proves they are NOT biologically related to. As child support is
mandatory for the first 18 years of a child's life, this means that
these males are forced to pay child support for up to 18 years.
Therefore based on this, a minimum of 1,600,000 (1.6 million) males are
being forced to financially support children that they are NOT
biologically related to.

On average 4,000,000 (4 million) children are born per year in USA,
therefore up to 1,200,000 American males are being victimised by
paternity fraud on an annual basis. This figure is produced via the fact
that DNA paternity testing proves that 30% of the males involved are not
biologically related to the children they were accused of being the
father of.

As many as 21,000,000 (21 million) American men at present are forced to
financially support a child they are not the biological father of. This
is all due to the lies of the mother and the injustice of the court
system. This calculation of such a figure was produced via the fact that
child support is paid over a minimum of 18 years, therefore males who
were victimised by paternity fraud just under 18 years ago will still be
paying child support. As 1,600,000 (1.6 million) American males become
victims of paternity fraud on an annual basis, over a span of 18 years
this equals 21,000,000 males who are being victimised to this very day.

The Law

While paternity fraud fits the criteria to be considered a form of
fraud, loopholes in the law system prevent offenders of paternity fraud
from being prosecuted via the law system. The method used in which a
male is forced by the Government to pay child support is very anti-male,
unfair and oppressive. It begins at the hospital, straight after birth
when the mother has to declare the name of a male and claim he is the
father of the child. She's allowed to put any name she likes without the
consent of the male and without his presence.

The male accused has only 30 days to dispute the claim, and if he
doesn't dispute the claim he is then forced to pay child support for at
least 18 years and refusing to do so can have him placed in jail.
Apparently it doesn't matter if he is overseas or serving in the
military during those 30 days and isn't even made aware of the claim
until the 30 day period has expired, he will be forced to pay child
support.

Feminism

Feminists have publicly stated how the law system MUST allow paternity
fraud to continue. Such absurd and illogical basis that the feminists
have used to base their demand on, is that the child's best interest
takes precedent over the fact that the mother committed a horrific crime
which has ruined the life of an innocent male, which has enslaved him
for at least 18 years. Their reasoning is that a child would be better
of not knowing who their biological father is. Now it's blatantly
obvious that there is no way that the child would benefit from what the
feminists claimed must happen. A child would benefit most from knowing
who their biological father is.

Also it is quite evident that the mother would benefit from the
situation that the feminists support, as the mother would

1.. Avoid being prosecuted
2.. She would obtain a large sum of money from the man she victimised
and continue to obtain that money on a monthly basis over a span of at
least 18 years.
\
Based on that, it's quite evident that the feminists only want a system
which allows females to commit paternity fraud, be given impunity from
the law system, be allowed to continue to commit paternity fraud which
then enslaves her victim so that he is legally forced to financially
support her.

The feminists have also stated that women who intentionally commit
paternity fraud should not be punished for their fraudulent actions,
because they claim their children need them. However the feminists do
not mention the fact that the children also "need" a biological father
as part of their life.

Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.

(All information was supplied by Charles E. Corry, Ph.D., F.G.S.A., and
the original article which he wrote can be found at Men For Justice.)

Paternity Fraud Links:

Paternity Fraud.Com

Paternity Fraud Statistics
--
Men are everywhere that matters!

A dog is wiser than a woman; it does not bark at its master.
Russian Proverb
Quintal
2006-02-10 21:43:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by LDL
Rest Snipped.
Post by Done
Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
To visit the section of Glenn Sack's site that contains the MP3 file,
Click Here. There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.
Why cut and paste when you can provide the URL.
because most people who read it when quoted wouldnt have read it if
only a link was provided.
Because usenet is an archive, whereas websites can shut down anytime.
Post by LDL
It is quite evident with the "Click Here" that is written in the paragraph.
why dont you take care of your own postings.
LDL
2006-02-11 08:59:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by Quintal
Post by LDL
Rest Snipped.
Post by Done
Melanie Jacobs, a vocal feminist has publicly stated similar comments on
Glenn Sack's radio program titled; "His Side" you can listen to an MP3
file of that specific program by downloading it from Glenn Sack's site.
To visit the section of Glenn Sack's site that contains the MP3 file,
Click Here. There is a written biography about Melanie Jacobs, which can
be found under the "Feminist Biographies" section.
Why cut and paste when you can provide the URL.
because most people who read it when quoted wouldnt have read it if
only a link was provided.
Because usenet is an archive, whereas websites can shut down anytime.
Post by LDL
It is quite evident with the "Click Here" that is written in the paragraph.
why dont you take care of your own postings.
Basically it is simply bad manners where an appropriate URL should better
suit.

Also the URL will also provide a bibliography and credibility rather reading
a whole lot of rubbish (generically).

Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...